The fallout from R-Truth’s WWE departure is still growing—and now some within the company are wondering why he wasn’t offered a different role instead of being let go.
According to PWInsider, several people backstage questioned why WWE didn’t offer Truth an ambassador position, similar to the role held by Titus O’Neil. Given how beloved R-Truth is by both fans and fellow talent, many assumed he would transition into a long-term position within the company—even if his in-ring career was winding down.
As one of the most universally respected and well-liked personalities in the locker room, Truth—real name Ron Killings—was seen by many as a WWE lifer. That perception was shattered over the weekend when a member of WWE’s talent relations team informed him that his contract would not be renewed.
The move stunned the roster. There had been no backstage issues, no heat, and no signs that Truth was on the chopping block. In fact, the reaction has been described as overwhelmingly negative, with some calling WWE’s decision “ruthless” and completely unnecessary.
Others have privately admitted that the release shook their confidence in the company’s long-term security. Some talents are now reportedly working to negotiate and lock in their next contracts early, out of concern that even tenure and popularity don’t guarantee protection.
While WWE has yet to release a public statement, the silence only adds to the frustration. Aside from a now-deleted tweet from SmackDown lead writer Brian “Road Dogg” James, the company hasn’t addressed the situation at all.
Now, with questions circulating about why Truth wasn’t given a role that could’ve kept him within WWE, the move feels even more confusing—and to many, like a wasted opportunity.
Should WWE have offered R-Truth an ambassador role instead of cutting ties? Please share your thoughts and feedback in the comment section below.