Categories
Why a CM Punk Loss Would Have Been a Better Story
by Lil Jimmy
Dolph Ziggler is fast becoming one of the superstars who will lead the WWE into a prosperous future, setting examples for the next generation.
Up until 2011, this wasn’t really happening, but last year, many superstars developed quickly and effectively.
Sheamus, Wade Barrett, Dolph Ziggler and Cody Rhodes are just a selection of talent that have come a mighty long way in a year and though some would argue that they have not fully developed yet, I believe Sheamus and Dolph Ziggler are primed and ready to be the top champions on their respective brands.
Sheamus has won the Royal Rumble and is likely to break the bad luck title challengers have faced at WrestleMania since 2007.
Last Sunday, Dolph Ziggler faced CM Punk for the top prize in the business and he lost, despite many people believing John Laurinaitis would screw CM Punk over.
I am here to tell you that it would have made for a better story if Ziggler had have won the WWE title from CM Punk.
John Laurinaitis was never going to work as a referee in that match so I’m glad he decided to take a back seat and let the proper referee do the officiating.
However, with CM Punk winning, it has put a big full stop on a huge feud that seemed to be in its infancy for me.
I think John Laurinaitis & CM Punk could have been this generation’s Austin & McMahon.
Though some don’t like the references to the past, it’s hard to avoid when it’s so similar to what we have seen before.
That isn’t a problem though, because it worked before, so with the right people, it’s bound to work again—and it was doing until CM Punk retained his title.
Johnny’s job now hangs in the balance thanks to The Undertaker’s rude entrance.
Had Dolph Ziggler knocked off Punk at this pay-per-view, then it could have spelt big things for Punk & Laurinaitis.
With Punk angry at Laurinaitis for screwing him out of the title, Johnny could have offered him a spot in the chamber match, but only after a long and arduous road due to obstacles put forward by Johnny.
It is a storyline we have all heard before, but as I said before, it works.
If this were to happen, it could only last until Elimination Chamber where Punk would have to regain the title much to Johnny’s dismay.
He has had a long reign with it already so I don’t think people would have claimed “hot potato” by giving Ziggler the title for a month.
At least it would be a longer reign than the one he had with the World Heavyweight Championship.
Giving the title to Ziggler would have had many benefits as he could have boasted that he beat the best in the world etc.
Chris Jericho could potentially be involved in this storyline and say that Ziggler hasn’t truly beaten the best in the world; securing his place in the chamber.
Punk vs. Jericho could be established in the chamber after Ziggler had been eliminated.
That way everyone is a winner and the WWE would have seen if Ziggler was ready to carry the company for an extended period of time, or whether he still needed improving in some areas.
More experience of being at the top is what he needs in my opinion and handing the title to him for a month would certainly give him the opportunity to show everyone what he is capable of when holding the strap.
I would then have Ziggler win Money in the Bank but that is irrelevant at the moment.
CM Punk and John Laurinaitis could still be feuding in the background as Jericho faced Punk at WrestleMania so that storyline, though lying low behind the prominent feud, could stay alive for when the time is right, much like Austin & McMahon.
The final reason I believe a Punk loss would have been better is because no-one was expecting it.
I have heard many say that unpredictability is bad if it is just to swerve the IWC, but the reasons highlighted here for giving Ziggler a chance completely debunk that theory, so the swerve would be impactful, whilst retaining scope for furthering storylines and making sure no-one gets lost in the mix.
Though this article has accidentally fallen a bit more into the fantasy aspect than I wanted it to, I believe I have highlighted the benefits that a CM Punk loss would have had on the Road to WrestleMania.
Source: Bleacherreport
Up until 2011, this wasn’t really happening, but last year, many superstars developed quickly and effectively.
Sheamus, Wade Barrett, Dolph Ziggler and Cody Rhodes are just a selection of talent that have come a mighty long way in a year and though some would argue that they have not fully developed yet, I believe Sheamus and Dolph Ziggler are primed and ready to be the top champions on their respective brands.
Sheamus has won the Royal Rumble and is likely to break the bad luck title challengers have faced at WrestleMania since 2007.
Last Sunday, Dolph Ziggler faced CM Punk for the top prize in the business and he lost, despite many people believing John Laurinaitis would screw CM Punk over.
I am here to tell you that it would have made for a better story if Ziggler had have won the WWE title from CM Punk.
John Laurinaitis was never going to work as a referee in that match so I’m glad he decided to take a back seat and let the proper referee do the officiating.
However, with CM Punk winning, it has put a big full stop on a huge feud that seemed to be in its infancy for me.
I think John Laurinaitis & CM Punk could have been this generation’s Austin & McMahon.
Though some don’t like the references to the past, it’s hard to avoid when it’s so similar to what we have seen before.
That isn’t a problem though, because it worked before, so with the right people, it’s bound to work again—and it was doing until CM Punk retained his title.
Johnny’s job now hangs in the balance thanks to The Undertaker’s rude entrance.
Had Dolph Ziggler knocked off Punk at this pay-per-view, then it could have spelt big things for Punk & Laurinaitis.
With Punk angry at Laurinaitis for screwing him out of the title, Johnny could have offered him a spot in the chamber match, but only after a long and arduous road due to obstacles put forward by Johnny.
It is a storyline we have all heard before, but as I said before, it works.
If this were to happen, it could only last until Elimination Chamber where Punk would have to regain the title much to Johnny’s dismay.
He has had a long reign with it already so I don’t think people would have claimed “hot potato” by giving Ziggler the title for a month.
At least it would be a longer reign than the one he had with the World Heavyweight Championship.
Giving the title to Ziggler would have had many benefits as he could have boasted that he beat the best in the world etc.
Chris Jericho could potentially be involved in this storyline and say that Ziggler hasn’t truly beaten the best in the world; securing his place in the chamber.
Punk vs. Jericho could be established in the chamber after Ziggler had been eliminated.
That way everyone is a winner and the WWE would have seen if Ziggler was ready to carry the company for an extended period of time, or whether he still needed improving in some areas.
More experience of being at the top is what he needs in my opinion and handing the title to him for a month would certainly give him the opportunity to show everyone what he is capable of when holding the strap.
I would then have Ziggler win Money in the Bank but that is irrelevant at the moment.
CM Punk and John Laurinaitis could still be feuding in the background as Jericho faced Punk at WrestleMania so that storyline, though lying low behind the prominent feud, could stay alive for when the time is right, much like Austin & McMahon.
The final reason I believe a Punk loss would have been better is because no-one was expecting it.
I have heard many say that unpredictability is bad if it is just to swerve the IWC, but the reasons highlighted here for giving Ziggler a chance completely debunk that theory, so the swerve would be impactful, whilst retaining scope for furthering storylines and making sure no-one gets lost in the mix.
Though this article has accidentally fallen a bit more into the fantasy aspect than I wanted it to, I believe I have highlighted the benefits that a CM Punk loss would have had on the Road to WrestleMania.
Source: Bleacherreport
Topics:
Dolph Ziggler, CM Punk
Tweet
- February 3, 2012 8:48 pm
- ·
- Like
- ·
- Comment
- ·
Pumbaa Zekunt
They needed a better challenger in the position... Ziggler is just too boring and untalented to hold the belt...
- February 4, 2012
- ·
- Report
- ·
- Like
- ·
- 2 people
New Blogs
Published on May 17, 2012 :: 160 Views
Is the Zack Ryder vs. Kane Too Little, T...
In a move that thus far has proved to be a smart one, the WWE is broadcasting another pre-PPV match via YouTube. The con...
Published on May 17, 2012 :: 178 Views
Why WWE Raw Permanently Being 3 Hours Is...
John Cena announced on his Twitter account Thursday afternoon that WWE Monday Night Raw will permanently become a three-...
Published on May 17, 2012 :: 180 Views
Is There Really Room for Ryback? Why Mon...
Ryback's push as a monster heel looks doomed to fail. In an already crowded market including established stars who are c...
Published on May 17, 2012 :: 703 Views
Directions for Christian When He Returns
Christian is on his way back in the WWE. It has been a long few months, but the Captain is about to make it happen! For ...
Trending Topics
Trending since May 11, 2012


