Please Make The World Titles Important Again
by Bobby Quinn
If there's one thing WWE has lost in the past 4 or 5 years it's the importance of their world titles. When the WWE decided to split the company into the Raw and Smackdown brands they initially had one "undisputed" world champion, in my opinion that was better, if you really look hard at it though it would make sense that eventually they would need two world titles. OK - two world titles, that's fine and hell they can get another guy over as world champion material right? Right - well they did OK for awhile but then it became commonplace for every new guy and his brother to win the world titles.
As far as the world titles are concerned it was 2005 that the world titles last seemed important to me. We had JBL have his epic almost year long world title reign for the Smackdown brand and Triple H had his title for almost a year eventually giving it up to Batista. After that we saw the heavyweight "Smackdown" title being treated with less and less importance and the WWE "Raw" title basically on the very unpopular John Cena's shoulder for most of the next few years.
All throughout the entire history of the WWE we saw them trying very hard to maintain the importance of their world titles which of course makes all the sense in the world. When we saw Triple H win the WWE title in 1999 for the first time ever - it meant something, it meant Triple H had arrived. Of course just having two titles now seems to water that impact down a little bit, with one champion he truly is "the man." Don't even get me started on how they've treated CM Punk as the champion which I've already done a column on, long story short it's a joke.
So how do we solve this problem? First off - PUT BOTH WORLD TITLES AS THE MAIN EVENTS ON EVERY PPV. Sorry I think that required a full capital sentence. Yes they can make a few exceptions, if a special attraction like Brock Lesnar or The Rock is on a PPV put them in the main event. The WWE is just missing out on something very instrumental that has always worked for them. They use to let the audience know that a wrestler had arrived when they won a world title. Now the belts are treated like props, which is exactly how we see them and it's sad. This is entertainment, not UFC I get that but lets suspend disbelief a little bit and treat those belts with some importance.
***Make sure you follow me on Twitter!!!! Twitter.com/wwetnablogger***
As far as the world titles are concerned it was 2005 that the world titles last seemed important to me. We had JBL have his epic almost year long world title reign for the Smackdown brand and Triple H had his title for almost a year eventually giving it up to Batista. After that we saw the heavyweight "Smackdown" title being treated with less and less importance and the WWE "Raw" title basically on the very unpopular John Cena's shoulder for most of the next few years.
All throughout the entire history of the WWE we saw them trying very hard to maintain the importance of their world titles which of course makes all the sense in the world. When we saw Triple H win the WWE title in 1999 for the first time ever - it meant something, it meant Triple H had arrived. Of course just having two titles now seems to water that impact down a little bit, with one champion he truly is "the man." Don't even get me started on how they've treated CM Punk as the champion which I've already done a column on, long story short it's a joke.
So how do we solve this problem? First off - PUT BOTH WORLD TITLES AS THE MAIN EVENTS ON EVERY PPV. Sorry I think that required a full capital sentence. Yes they can make a few exceptions, if a special attraction like Brock Lesnar or The Rock is on a PPV put them in the main event. The WWE is just missing out on something very instrumental that has always worked for them. They use to let the audience know that a wrestler had arrived when they won a world title. Now the belts are treated like props, which is exactly how we see them and it's sad. This is entertainment, not UFC I get that but lets suspend disbelief a little bit and treat those belts with some importance.
***Make sure you follow me on Twitter!!!! Twitter.com/wwetnablogger***
Tweet
- ·
- September 21, 2012 9:47 pm
2People who like this
Chris Hall
The titles in TNA is importent right
- September 21, 2012
- ·
- Like
Bobby Quinn
@Chris Hall - It seems like they treat the titles in TNA a little more important they just need more homegrown stars in the company which they can't seem to be able to do unfortunately.
- September 21, 2012
- ·
- Like
Chris Hall
What you mean homegrown stars
- September 21, 2012
- ·
- Like
Bobby Quinn
Like Samoa Joe and AJ Styles are two guys TNA made stars, they have a few other guys but they're not as good as WWE at creating big time stars if they work on that it would help them a lot. The WWE is the king of creating stars, WCW didn't create a lot but they had a lot of money so they could buy o...
View More
- September 21, 2012
- ·
- Like
- ·
- 1 person
Chris Hall
you have to admit TNA seems to take it more seriously and geared more towards adults. they got more depth in their main roster unlike the WWE. WWE makes the stars TNA takes them LOL
- September 22, 2012
- ·
- Like
- ·
- 2 people
steve cyr
ive been argueing this very topic in another blog! lol.. i totally agree.. make the titles important.. and how you do that is by having just one top title.. not two..
- September 22, 2012
- ·
- Like
- ·
- 1 person
Rick Wall
They'd mean something if John Cena stepped away for awhile because lets be honest, WWE seem to make Cena feel more important than the two World champions, if Cena disappeared for awhile, who knows, the two world titles might be more relevant.
- September 22, 2012
- ·
- Like
- ·
- 3 people
Angela Arnold
I agree Rick
- September 22, 2012
- ·
- Like
Steve Lord
isn't the only reason Cena lost the title was because Vince didn't want his match with Rock to be for a Title ?
- September 23, 2012
- ·
- Like
Angela Arnold
No Vince wants it for the title because that means more $$$ in his pocket. It's US the fans who don't want it for the title.
- September 23, 2012
- ·
- Like
to post comments
May 19, 2013|Steve Carrier|798
May 18, 2013|Steve Carrier|643
May 16, 2013|Jason Haefer|652
May 15, 2013|Kadee Husfelt|1128
Trending Topics
Trending since May 14, 2013







